Incredible power and impressive fuel economy for a truck of this size combine to make for one great drivetrain — leaving no question as to why the EcoBoost V6 has quickly become the most popular engine in the F150 family. The Final Word After my second time in a 2012 Ford F150 powered by the EcoBoost V6, I have found that not only can the twin turbocharged V6 do anything that a V8 can but it can also reach incredible fuel economy figures when it is not under heavy load. Once I got onto the I280, heading towards the Ohio Turnpike, the fuel economy figures on the on board vehicle computer improved considerably and by the time I had spent an hour cruising along the wide open vastness of the northern Ohio plains, the fuel economy of the 2012 Ford F150 EcoBoost had climbed up into the expected combined fuel economy range of 18 miles per gallon. And the inverter of the car was in ruff shape. During this drive, I made regular gas stops along the way to test the actual fuel economy figures based on gallons of gas used and miles driven. Definitely not a dealership that I would recommend.
Ford was concerned early on that the skeptics would outweight those buyers who were interested in a twin turbo V6 pickup truck but the real world results with the EcoBoost F150 lead me to believe that this engine will be around for a very long time. By the end of my 370 mile drive, my actual fuel economy figure for the drive was 17. There was nothing wrong with a direct connection to the throttle body with a cable. People are taking a serious risk from this auction car dealership! While cruising on the highway, the EcoBoost V6 has absolutely no audible drone in the cabin and even when you thrust the EcoBoost into passing gear, the truck is still surprisingly quiet. All kinds of woarning lites.
This presented what were essentially the worst aspects of city driving as we moved in bursts of about a quarter mile at a time, reaching speeds only in the mid 30s before being forced to lurch back to a stop. Some old school truck buyer might question the ability of the EcoBoost V6 to conduct itself like an American V8 but with fuel economy figures topping the 20mpg range on the highway in real world testing, the Ford F150 EcoBoost 4x4 makes good on all of the promises made by Ford Motor Company. Then they had to run it up the street to get fuel. . During this long run across northern Ohio, I also made a stop to check the actual fuel economy figures and the on-board computer was very accurate — with my test truck getting 21 miles per gallon. The interior and exterior both look super, very clean and roomy.
Since the battery needed replacing, all the smog info had been cleared from the van's memory, requiring me to drive it ~200 miles before I could even get it tested myself. While my test truck was fitted with the base model sound system, it still sounded great on my long drive and the steering wheel mounted controls for the radio and the cruise controls system allowed me to make changes on the fly without taking my hands off of the wheel. The ability to perform these truck tasks by this relatively small twin turbocharged engine has been questioned by numerous skeptics but in the long run, the EcoBoost proved that it can do anything that the V8 options in any modern half-ton pickup can do. That is because of the hills and gas here in sw Michigan. Which sensor is Bank 1 Sensor A? I believe they are located toward the back of the engine instead of the front. The readout for the stereo system appears on a thin screen mounted along the top edge of the center stack and dashboard.
The speed limit fluctuated between 55 and 65 miles per hour but the hills decreased the fuel economy into the range of 17-18 miles per gallon. Multiple rust spots, broken mirror, broke tail light that is technically illegal to drive with in the state of Ohio, vehicle reeked of marijuana, found maggots in the back seat, back passenger door was filled with water. However, the area in which I was visiting had very few causes to stop so there was almost no stop and go driving during my test sessions in the South Hills area of Pittsburgh. Great suspension, great handling make this truck a nice ride. The only thing I have as a con is the throttle. I dislike the throttle response. From what I understand, there is a single Crankshaft Position Sensor and four Camshaft Position Sensors two 2 pin and two 3 pin.
Do you think with this now it would be safer to venture out without worrying about the gas and hills. While it has a ride that you would expect from a half ton pickup capable of towing over 11,000 pounds, the 2012 F150 was surprisingly smooth and very comfortable on the highway. Ben assured me that it had. This went on until we were well south of Detroit and as we neared the Ohio Turnpike, our fuel economy figures were hovering around a disappointing 16 miles per gallon but I am admit that my frustration with the stupid traffic caused me to drive in a manner that was less than idea for achieving great fuel economy. Please go back to a throttle cable. After pointing all of this out without even starting the vehicle he tried to sell me the vehicle for asking price still! More importantly, I found that when cruising at the 65mph speed limit on the traffic-free Ohio Turnpike, the trip computer stated that I was getting around 21-22 miles per gallon. Apr 29, 2016 by 10.
P0016 Crankshaft-Camshaft position correlation Bank 1 Sensor A This code gets confusing listing the sensor as sensor A, This vehicle has 4 variable camshaft timing solenoids , On Bank 1 there are 2 variable valve timing one for the intake and one for the exhaust. During the early stages of my trip, the 2012 Ford F150 4x4 with the EcoBoost V6 was averaging less than 14 miles per gallon when dealing with the frustrating stop and go traffic on I94 and I75 around the Detroit area. When I was taken to the right vehicle, it has multiple issues that were not at all even mentioned in the description. They couldn't find the keys for the car. When we took the car for a ride the dashboard lit up like a Christmas tree.
I should point out that while cruising on the highway, when the speeds climbed up into the 75-80mph range, fuel economy figures dropped into the range of 18-19mpg so those with a lead foot in an area with a higher speed limit may have a more difficult time hitting those 21mpg figures. . . . . .