The beautiful Brandy Mason seems like the hot librarian of the group with her red hair up in a bun and her cat-eye glasses. They kind of knew what they were doing and had fun with it. Making movies is hard because there are so many details that the audience will only notice if you eff it up. Too bad to waste the clever, yet obvious title on such a snoozefest. Moron lead characters, blabbering in the car, on their way to the camp site, is filmed through the rolled up windows, so we're looking at reflections of the forests they're driving through for this entire sequence.
How this movie possibly got an average rating of 8. It's simply so bad I want money back,and I didn't even pay to see it! To not fucking in the woods so, really expect practically porn. All that is irrelevant because people will watch this for the nudity and sex. Aside from some racy love scenes, and pretty good lighting in the middle of the dark forest, the movie didn't do much for production, and that seems to be the point of the company that made it. So when I watched the film, it actually hurt.
Grab some munchies and spark a j because you found what you were looking for. As much as I wanted to like this movie, mainly for the goofy title, it just was not good. Amateur acting and bland cinematography. I love low budget and even micro-budget cinema. She also makes makes out with Ayse Howard in a sensual lesbian scene that is a ton of fun to drool over.
Tapi bukankah anak-anak tahu bahwa mengeong di hutan itu berantakan, tidak bersih, dan sangat, sangat berbahaya? Yet oddly depresses me too. The technical aspects are all pretty decent. It's no where near good by any stretch of the imagination but still, it's exactly what you should expect, don't go into this expecting some marvel of a movie, it is what it is, even if that is just practically porn. I last saw that imbalance in a Dana Carvey movie. Clearly this movie was made with effort over budget and a passion for the genre. Skin would have a field day with these dames in the woods! I expect to see young hot girls get some variety of naked, have simulated sex, and then be killed horribly.
There are some good things about the film, some of the cast tries very hard while others almost derail the film entirely. But didn't the kids know that funking in the woods is messy, unsanitary, and very, very dangerous? I probably would not feel so disappointed. It has everything a movie needs- Love, Sex, Drama Thriller, Comedy, and most importantly, great acting skills. I don't know how this ever got funding because plain and simple it is nothing but vile. I couldn't refine my sensibilities to ignore the movie when I saw the title. The antagonist is not explained, but I don't think plausibility could justify this production.
The bloopers last ten minutes. If you want to see women who expose their breasts, and then are killed, you might like this movie. Who signs off on it's production? It's about a bunch of ,what look to be,washed up tattoo'd rejects from the porn industry,trying to pass themselves off as teenagers,on a camping trip,doing a lot of drinking and sex and getting killed by a man in a plastic looking suit and a terrible mask,doing an awful job of acting as a monster. The dialog was great for the most part and they all seemed to be a real group of friends. What really is a surprise is the quality of the acting.
Ugly, fat women--all looking like they're auditioning for a role in a porno film; ugly fat men, lesbians with way too many tattoos, no reasoning for what and why is in the woods--this will be a story these bimbos hopefully won't bother sharing with anyone. More blabbering when they get there, before this muck creature which looks like it was doused with pancake syrup kills most of them, playing all the film's cards in that single scene. Literally nothing more than amateur porn stars Nadia White's sex scene looks genuine and unsimulated filmed using an iPhone. One such scene sees a character on all fours with her fella hammering her from behind. Are they proud of their work? The following aerial shots look like they were taken from YouTube, and they likely were, considering this film's zero-budget.
I guess that is the problem I am having. Its camera work is very uh, I dunno, amatuer horror film? I wouldn't watch it if you like films that you can think about and discuss later. Especially not the creature creator, whom I assume shops at the local Halloween store. After the terrible nu-metal theme song mercifully ends, and the idiotic dream scene, we get two decent looking girls in bed together, talking about this weekend's camping trip. I have seen these same reviewers attack films I like for bad acting or pacing issues and pretty much all that I found wrong here, yet they acted like this film was simply perfect. Once they get to the woods, everything takes a terrible turn for the worst.
Such as: Who the hell makes these films? If you were expecting more then why did you hit the play button? I thoroughly enjoy finding low budget movies made by unknowns to find your Raimis or Jacksons both of which I found on their shoestring budget flicks long before Hollywood this movie isn't going to be catapulting anyone into stardom. I like natural girls and Motionless In White, both are present here. The acting is okay, the effects are okay, the script is okay. It works so well because of the camera angles. But I will say, in the end, the blooper reel did seem like the kids had fun in filming this, so at least that is good. I've seen plenty of movies that make this look like a solid 8. Skin wanting to tear her clothes off to see her skin better.